All posts by Jim Muttram

The day at FOWA

I’m spending the day at Future of Web Apps, a two-day conference featuring some (what I hope are) interesting speakers, including Mike Arrington of Techcrunch, Kevin Rose of Digg and Matt Mullenweg of WordPress.

A few things I like about the event: there’s a system of stickers, for people with money and people who need money; and for people with jobs and people looking for jobs; all the seats are within range of power; there is wifi – but sadly not free. (15.30: UPDATE: it appears the organisers did spend the money on a really whizzy wireless network, but the telco cocked up and hence the fallback – BT OpenZone, which simply can’t cope with the volume! They promise to try to get it working by tomorrow).

A few things I don’t like: the (standard Kensington Town Hall) coffee costs £1.50 (when there’s a Cafe Nero just down the road; there’s not much imaginative use of web technology – questions could be gathered from the floor during the session online (especially as every third person has a laptop.

Technorati Tags:

Yahoo! Pipes up close

Yahoo! recently launched Yahoo! Pipes, which is a Web 2.0 service for combining and processing feeds of any kind. The name is inspired by “pipes” in Unix which are simple programming functions which can be easily combined together to do much more powerful things, and that is was the new web service sets out to do. Lifehacker contributor Gina Trapani provides an excellent walk-through example of Pipes in use. The current arms race inspired by Google’s breathless pace of R&D is producing some really powerful tools which are sparking real innovation. Long may it continue.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Google responds to Belgian Court Decision

Rachel Whetstone, European Director of Communications and Public Affairs, has posted a response to the Belgian Court’s decision upholding a complaint by Copiepresse, the newspaper group. She points out:

We believe search engines are of real benefit to publishers because they drive valuable traffic to their websites. If publishers do not want their websites to appear in search results, technical standards like robots.txt and metatags enable them automatically to prevent the indexation of their content. These Internet standards are nearly universally accepted and are honored by all reputable search engines. In addition, Google has a clear policy of respecting the wishes of content owners. If a newspaper does not want to be part of Google News, we remove their content from our index—all the newspaper has to do is ask. There is no need for legal action and all the associated costs.

Sounds reasonable to me….