The problem with lies and half-truths

Jeff Javis writes a thoughtful post responding to the blanket criticism of "citizen journalists" following the false story of Steve Jobs’ "heart attack" on CNN’s iReport.

The main problem isn’t with citizen journalism, he says, but with credulous readers (and that isn’t a new problem).

we have to get better at giving caveats. As news rushes by, it is important that we make it clear what is and isn’t confirmed. We thought we were in the business of saying what we know in the news. But we’re more in the business of saying what we don’t know. I’ve often quoted Nick Denton’s definition of what we bloggers call “half-baked posts.” They say to our readers: “Here’s what we know. Here’s what we don’t know. What do you know?”

The "story" was corrected very fast by journalists contacting Apple for clarification, he points out.

The web, as it turns out, is almost as fast at spreading truth as it as at spreading rumors.

Technorati Tags: ,,

In difficult times…

With t&e budgets likely to be slashed around the world next year some enterprising bloggers have come up with a novel idea: free conferences on the web. They have collected (curated if you like) what they consider to be the best free presentations around a subject and are offering them to the world. I’ve found two so far:

The Online Marketing Conference and
Pixelated – the Online Business Conference

What a fantastic idea. I wonder if there is enough content for us to do the same in some of our verticals? Worth a look, surely…

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Towards a new paradigm

The building block of journalism is no longer the article; so says Jeff Jarvis in a post which argues that the web needs a new paradigm.

The story was all we had before — it’s what would fit onto a newspaper page or into a broadcast show. But a discrete and serial series of articles over days cannot adequately cover the complex stories going on now nor can they properly inform the public. There’s too much repetition. Too little explanation.

Instead:

… I want a page, a site, a thing that is created, curated, edited, and discussed. It’s a blog that treats a topic as an ongoing and cumulative process of learning, digging, correcting, asking, answering. It’s also a wiki that keeps a snapshot of the latest knowledge and background. It’s an aggregator that provides annotated links to experts, coverage, opinion, perspective, source material. It’s a discussion that doesn’t just blather but that tries to accomplish something (an extension of an article like this one that asks what options there are to bailout a bailout). It’s collaborative and distributed and open but organized.

In response to the huge complexities and fast past of the economic crisis, will we see a new form emerge? I actually think one of our blogs, Flightblogger, is already doing something like this for the 787 programme – he’s mixing the fast (Twitter) with the slow and reflective (old-fashioned feature articles) and pulling it together in one place. What’s probably missing is easy access to “the story so far”.

Technorati Tags: , ,

What happened to Digg?

I was making a presentation to the news team at Estates Gazette on Friday and as part of the story I pulled off a series of traffic graphs from Alexa to show the relative share of voice of traditional newspapers (The Guadian and New York Times), aggregators (Digg), social networking sites (Facebook) and video (YouTube).

The general story is predictable and well illustrated by the Alexa charts (check it out: one, two, three, four, five – see what I mean?) but the interesting back story is: what has happened to Digg? The site has enjoyed uninterupted growth until June and then has fallen to one third of its relative popularity. I checked out competitors, and the only one making inroads seems to be Mixx – and it’s growth doesn’t explain the fall. Any ideas?

BTW credit to the idea of comparing in this way goes to my colleague Karl.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Clay Shirky

Notes on Clay’s talk:
Sharing

Gather then share was the pattern; now it is share then gather.

Don’t believe the myth of quality.

Collaboration

There is no such thing as the average user in the participatory model.

From recruiting and managing to inviting and rewarding.

DRM is nostalgia instantiated software

This is a time for high levels of experimentation.

[Posted with iBlogger from my iPhone]

FT Video

Richard Edgar,head of video at FT Video:
Rules
1. Get the best technical person you can find
2. Decide what model to use:
A. Throw people in at the deep end
B. News room within a news room – quick, painless but expensive
C. Train up evangelists and seed the newsroom – the best route as this integrates video into the heart of the brand.
Rules
3.Develop brands
4. Develop strands – good for commercialisation.
Video now accounts for 10% of ft.com revenues.

[Posted with iBlogger from my iPhone]